Recognizing human activities and detecting anomalous behaviors in crowded scenes from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery remains a challenging problem due to severe occlusions, scale compression, viewpoint distortion, and weak appearance cues, which limit the effectiveness of conventional ground-based and 2D appearance-driven methods. To address these challenges, this paper proposes CrowdVoxel-Net, a geometry-aware multimodal framework for UAV-based activity recognition and anomaly detection, in which a novel aerial silhouette extraction network, SA-Net, is introduced to enable reliable human foreground isolation under complex drone viewpoints. Building upon the extracted silhouettes, pseudo-3D human structure is reconstructed via monocular depth estimation and encoded using voxelized orthogonal depth projections to capture spatial and volumetric cues in a view-consistent manner. Long-range and occlusion-resilient spatiotemporal motion dynamics are modeled using CoTracker, while robust and domain-invariant semantic representations are extracted using a Vision Transformer–enabled DINO self-supervised backbone. In addition, local structural cues are strengthened using a compact keypoint–driven descriptor and a fast cross-frame matching module, improving geometric alignment under challenging aerial viewpoints. These complementary geometric, semantic, spatial, and temporal representations are fused and modeled using a Transformer-based classifier for joint activity recognition and anomaly detection. The proposed framework is evaluated on four challenging benchmarks, including UAV-Human, Drone Action, ShanghaiTech, and CADG, achieving classification accuracies of 53.3% on the full 155-class UAV-Human dataset, 85.2% on its 15-class subset, 91.2% on Drone Action, 95.2% on ShanghaiTech, and 85.7% on CADG, consistently outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods and demonstrating strong robustness and generalization under diverse UAV surveillance scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: