Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic lobectomy and compare perioperative and late outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral thoracoscopic lobectomy. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2017, the medical records of patients who underwent bilateral thoracoscopic lobectomy for synchronous bilateral multiple primary lung cancer (SPLC) were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate analysis was used to examine the factors associated with morbidity. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 45.9%, P=0.039). In subgroup analysis, simultaneous resection also had a significantly better survival than staged resection in patients with bilateral pure solid lesions or the biggest tumor size >3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thoracoscopic lobectomy could be a feasible option for SPLC based on appropriate patient selection and careful perioperative management. Meanwhile, simultaneous resection has significantly advantaged in reducing the cost, preventing tumor progression compare to staged resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: