Cytogenetic analysis demonstrates chromosomal variation and hybrid origins in bulbous iris varieties, highlighting evolutionary relationships and ploidy differences.
Karyotype analyses were made of species and garden varieties of bulbous irises, including I. winogradowii (2n = 16), I. histrioides var. Major (2n=16), I. histrioides (2n=17), I. reticulata var. Violet Beauty (2n=18), I. reticulata var. Clarette (2n=20), and I. danfordiae (3n=27). 2. I. winogradowii has 8 pairs of chromosomes, including 2 pairs of metacentrics, of which 1 has a truly median centromere. The remaining chromosomes are acrocentric with subterminal centromeres. 3. I. histrioides var. Major has 8 pairs of chromosomes, of which 3 pairs are metacentric, and 2 of these have median centromeres. Another form of this species has an extra fragment-like chromosome with a subterminal centromere in addition to the regular 8 pairs. 4. I. reticulata var. Violet Beauty has 18 chromosomes, a new number for this species, and the presence of unpaired chromosomes indicates that it is a hybrid involving plants of unlike chromosome morphology. The Clarette variety of this species has 20 chromosomes, mostly unpaired and obviously of hybrid origin. 5. I. danfordiae has 27 chromosomes, including 3 identical sets, apparently of autotriploid origin. 6. The natural affinities of these species of bulbous iris are discussed primarily from the standpoint of similarities and differences in their karyotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitra et al. (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: