Surface‐based measurements of atmospheric formic acid (HCOOH), acetic acid (CH 3 COOH), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), hydrogen chloride (HCl), and nitric acid (HNO 3 ) were made in central São Paulo State, Brazil, between April 1999 and March 2000. Mean concentrations were 9.0 ppb (HCOOH), 1.3 ppb (CH 3 COOH), 4.9 ppb (SO 2 ), 0.3 ppb (HCl), and 0.5 ppb (HNO 3 ). Concentrations in sugar cane burning plumes were 1160–4230 ppb (HCOOH), 360–1750 ppb (CH 3 COOH), 10–630 ppb (SO 2 ), 4–210 ppb (HCl), and 14–90 ppb (HNO 3 ). Higher ambient concentrations of SO 2 , HCl and HNO 3 were measured during the burning season (May–November). Concentrations of SO 2 and HCl increased during the evening, and of HCOOH and CH 3 COOH were lowest in the morning, with peak levels in the afternoon. Ratios obtained between different species showed either nighttime maxima (SO 2 /HCOOH, SO 2 /CH 3 COOH, SO 2 /HNO 3 , CH 3 COOH/HNO 3 , SO 2 /HCl and HCOOH/HNO 3 ), daytime maxima (HCOOH/HCl, CH 3 COOH/HCl and HNO 3 /HCl), or no clear trends (HCOOH/CH 3 COOH). Correlation analysis showed that SO 2 and HCl were primary emissions from biomass burning and road transport; HCOOH, HNO 3 and CH 3 COOH were products of photochemistry; HCOOH and CH 3 COOH were emitted directly during combustion as well as from biogenic sources. Biomass burning affected atmospheric acidity on a regional scale, while vehicular emissions had greater impact in urban and adjacent areas. Atmospheric ammonia levels were insufficient to neutralize atmospheric acidity, which was mainly removed by deposition to the surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: