Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using a solid phase assay, we show that isolated LFA-1 I domain binds ICAM-1 in a Mg2+-dependent manner and is blocked by anti-I domain monoclonal antibodies. This activity mirrors that of the intact receptor (Dransfield, I., Cabañas, C., Craig, A., and Hogg, N. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 219-226) and suggests that the I domain controls divalent cation-dependent receptor function. In ICAM-1, domain 1 residues Glu-34 and Gln-73 have been identified as critical for binding of LFA-1 as an intact receptor (Staunton, D. E., Dustin, M. L., Erickson, H. P., and Springer, T. A. (1990) Cell 61, 243-254). For the first time, we show that isolated I domain binds to domain 1 of ICAM-1 and that this interaction is inhibited partially by mutation of Glu-34 but not by Gln-73. The anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody RR1/1, which maps to Gln-73 (Staunton, D. E., Dustin, M. L., Erickson, H. P., and Springer, T. A. (1990) Cell 61, 243-254), enhances I domain binding, suggesting potential allosteric control or coordinate binding by this region. Finally, I domain binding inhibited by Glu-34 ICAM-1 mutation correlates with divalent cation dependence, indicating that this residue might be in direct contact with the metal ion-dependent adhesion site. Thus, we describe the interaction between the LFA-1 I domain and ICAM-1, an event that controls the function of the intact receptor but includes only part of the complete ligand binding site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanley et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: