Spatial modeling analysis demonstrates how infrastructure and density drive sector emissions across the United States, highlighting the need for coordinated multiscale climate policies.
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions vary spatially with development patterns, climate, economic structure, and energy systems. Using Vulcan v4.0 fossil-fuel CO2 (FFCO2) data for the United States at 1-km resolution, this study examines how land use and infrastructure shape emissions at local and metropolitan scales. I combine doubly robust Bayesian Additive Regression Tree estimators with multi-treatment spatial regression models to identify local and spillover effects by sector. A key methodological contribution is treating transportation emissions as production-based, capturing infrastructure carbon burden rather than household-attributed travel demand. Results show strong scale dependence and spatial interaction: in the preferred heteroscedasticity-robust SEM+SLX model with a 10-km distance band, residual spatial autocorrelation declines substantially. Local roadway design is a strong negative predictor of transportation FFCO2, while neighbouring land use diversity exceeds local diversity. In residential sectors, higher local density is consistently associated with lower per-capita emissions. These findings support coordinated multi-scale mitigation policy in the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Hawkins (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: