Mixed-methods study identifies institutional barriers in specialty colleges, highlighting the need for unified policy and dedicated infrastructure.
INTRODUCTION: E-learning is increasingly central to postgraduate medical education (PGME), yet system-level barriers may hinder its integration. In Hong Kong, the Academy of Medicine (HKAM) has invested in a learning management system and faculty development, but uptake among Academy Colleges remains uneven. This study examined barriers and enablers across Colleges to inform system-level implementation. METHODS: We used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews with one e-learning lead from each of the 13 participating Colleges, which were analysed thematically. Phase 2 comprised a survey of 266 education committee members, of whom 88 responded (33.1%). Items were rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), with optional free-text comments. RESULTS: Five themes emerged, namely, (1) limited strategic urgency; (2) gaps in faculty capability and trainee readiness; (3) weak system enablers; (4) lack of recognition and resources; and (5) the need for system-level strategies. The survey corroborated these findings, with the lowest ratings for information technology (IT) support and incentives and the highest for a clear HKAM policy (mean, 4.20) and inter-College benchmarking (mean, 4.01). System enablers received the lowest overall score (mean, 2.89); recognition and resource allocation also scored poorly (mean, 2.87). Strategic buy-in was moderate (mean, 3.53), highlighting a contrast between strong demand for central direction and limited operational support. CONCLUSION: Sustainable PGME e-learning requires integrated action across motivation, capability, and opportunity. Leadership signalling and recognition are needed to strengthen motivation; tiered faculty development and trainee orientation to build capability; and coordinated IT support, workflow integration, and resource sharing to expand opportunity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: