Why the study?
Emotion-based or EEG-based approaches remain single modes of emotion recognition, whereas multi-mode fusion may improve accuracy by utilizing feature diversity and correlation.
Does a multi-mode LSTM-CNN model combining facial expressions and EEG improve emotion recognition accuracy compared to single-mode models?
Does a multi-mode LSTM-CNN model combining facial expressions and EEG improve emotion recognition accuracy compared to single-mode models?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A multi-mode deep learning model combining facial expressions and EEG signals improves emotion recognition accuracy compared to single-mode approaches.
With the rapid development of deep learning and artificial intelligence, affective computing, as a branch field, has attracted increasing research attention. Human emotions are diverse and are directly expressed via non-physiological indicators, such as electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, whether emotion-based or EEG-based, these remain single-modes of emotion recognition. Multi-mode fusion emotion recognition can improve accuracy by utilizing feature diversity and correlation. Therefore, three different models have been established: the single-mode-based EEG-long and short-term memory (LSTM) model, the Facial-LSTM model based on facial expressions processing EEG data, and the multi-mode LSTM-convolutional neural network (CNN) model that combines expressions and EEG. Their average classification accuracy was 86.48%, 89.42%, and 93.13%, respectively. Compared with the EEG-LSTM model, the Facial-LSTM model improved by about 3%. This indicated that the expression mode helped eliminate EEG signals that contained few or no emotional features, enhancing emotion recognition accuracy. Compared with the Facial-LSTM model, the classification accuracy of the LSTM-CNN model improved by 3.7%, showing that the addition of facial expressions affected the EEG features to a certain extent. Therefore, using various modal features for emotion recognition conforms to human emotional expression. Furthermore, it improves feature diversity to facilitate further emotion recognition research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: