Diagnostic study reveals higher pathogen yield with flocked swabs in bacterial keratitis, indicating a superior microbiological culture technique.
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of flocked-swab and cotton-swab culture methods in patients with bacterial keratitis.Methods: Twentytwo patients diagnosed with bacterial keratitis between May 2024 and August 2025 were included. Corneal specimens were collected using both cotton and flocked swabs. The cotton-swab samples were directly inoculated onto blood, chocolate, and MacConkey agar plates. The flocked-swab specimens were first incubated for 24 h in brain heart infusion broth before plating onto the same media.Results: The flocked-swab method detected Streptococcus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli, which were not detected by the cotton-swab method. Causative organisms were isolated in 7 patients (31.8%) using the cotton-swab method and in 16 patients (72.7%) using the flocked-swab method, which demonstrated a significantly higher positivity rate (p = 0.0039). The two methods showed concordant results in 59.1% of cases, with Cohen’s κ = 0.298, indicating fair agreement. All nine discordant cases were negative using the cotton-swab method but positive using the flocked-swab method (p = 0.0039). The median time to positivity was 44.5 hours for the cotton swabs and 24.5 hours for the flocked swabs; the shorter trend was not statistically significant (p = 0.216).Conclusions: Compared to cotton swabs, the flocked-swab culture method detected additional organisms, achieved a significantly higher positivity rate, and yielded a shorter time to positivity. Flocked-swab culture may serve as a clinically useful alternative for the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial keratitis when standard culture methods are unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: