Experimental smelting study demonstrates equivalent chromium recovery using waste-derived aluminosilicochrome versus conventional ferrosilicochrome, indicating viable industrial recycling potential.
This study investigates the possibility of using aluminosilicochrome (ASC) produced from technogenic raw materials as a potential alternative to FSC-48 ferrosilicochrome in refined ferrochrome smelting. Laboratory smelting tests were carried out in an induction furnace using alumina crucibles with a charge mass of 50 g. The two variants were compared based on the material balance, SEM-EDS analysis of the metallic and slag phases, a conditional estimate of chromium transfer to the metal, and the results of thermodynamic modeling in FactSage 8.4. It was established that a Cr–Fe metallic phase is formed when both FSC-48 and ASC are used. The average metal mass was 13.8 g for FSC-48 and 13.3 g for ASC. According to SEM-EDS data, the Cr content in the metallic phase was 70.53 and 68.64 wt. %, respectively. Aluminum introduced with ASC predominantly transfers into the slag, increasing its Al content to 20.81 wt. %. The conditional estimate of total chromium transfer from the charge to the metallic phase was 91.9% for FSC-48 and 91.6% for ASC. FactSage modeling showed higher calculated ore-derived Cr recovery for ASC under equilibrium conditions; however, excessive ASC addition increased the Si content in the metal. The obtained results confirm the fundamental possibility of using ASC as a complex reductant in refined ferrochrome smelting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Issagulov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: