Prospective case-control study finds reduced fetal Evans Index in growth-restricted fetuses, indicating subtle anterior brain remodeling without independent prognostic value.
Background Fetal growth restriction (FGR) can affect fetal brain development despite adaptive circulatory redistribution. The fetal Evans Index (EI)—the ratio of frontal horn width to inner cranial diameter—may capture proportional cranial remodeling in FGR.Methods In a prospective case–control study of singleton pregnancies ≥32 weeks, FGR was defined by Delphi consensus criteria. EI and frontal proportional ratios were obtained on the standardized axial transventricular plane. We evaluated how well EI distinguished FGR cases from controls and whether its association with NICU admission was independent of conventional fetal growth measurements.Results The cohort comprised 129 pregnancies (67 FGR, 62 controls). EI was lower in FGR than in controls (0.28 ± 0.02 vs 0.30 ± 0.02; p < 0.001), alongside reduced frontal horn width and a lower FABD/OFD ratio (p < 0.001). EI correlated strongly with frontal horn width (r = 0.752, p < 0.001). EI provided moderate discrimination for FGR (AUC = 0.707, 95% CI 0.617–0.797; cut-off 0.297; sensitivity 78.8%, specificity 51.6%). NICU admission was markedly higher in FGR (44.8% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001). EI ≥ 0.297 was associated with reduced NICU odds in univariate analysis (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.07–0.62), but not after adjustment (adjusted OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.11–1.38); abdominal circumference percentile remained independently associated with NICU admission (adjusted OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99).Conclusions Late-onset FGR is associated with reduced EI and altered frontal proportional indices, suggesting subtle anterior cerebral remodeling rather than ventriculomegaly. EI may provide complementary neurosonographic information, but its stand-alone diagnostic or prognostic value appears limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kından et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: