Key result
Queen of Hearts AI model doubles OMI detection sensitivity to 52% vs standard STEMI criteria.
Why the study?
The Queen of Hearts ECG artificial intelligence model demonstrated improved sensitivity for detecting occlusion myocardial infarction compared with STEMI criteria, but further validation was needed in ED chest pain patients.
Does the Queen of Hearts AI ECG model improve detection of occlusion myocardial infarction compared to conventional STEMI criteria in ED patients with chest pain?
Observational (n=24,511)
Blinded adjudication of outcomes and blinded application of the AI model
Yes
Does the Queen of Hearts AI ECG model improve detection of occlusion myocardial infarction compared to conventional STEMI criteria in ED patients with chest pain?
The Queen of Hearts AI ECG model significantly improved the sensitivity of detecting occlusion myocardial infarction compared to standard STEMI criteria in ED patients with chest pain, while maintaining high specificity.
May support AI ECG use for OMI detection in ED chest pain; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Objectives The Queen of Hearts (QoH) ECG artificial intelligence model has demonstrated improved sensitivity for detecting occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) compared with STEMI criteria, but further validation is needed. We aimed to evaluate QoH's diagnostic performance in patients with chest pain at Swedish emergency departments (EDs). Methods This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients with chest pain at the ED from the ESC-TROP study (2017-2018). Patients transferred directly from the prehospital setting to the coronary care unit were not included. OMI classification was based on angiographic data and expert adjudication. QoH, conventional STEMI criteria, and the Glasgow ECG Analysis Algorithm were applied to all cases. In addition, extended STEMI criteria incorporating additional ECG leads (-V1, -V2, -V3, -aVL, -aVR, and -III) and OMI criteria for left bundle branch block (modified Sgarbossa criteria) and left ventricular hypertrophy (ST elevation V1-V3 ≥0.25 of R and S) were applied. Results Among 24,511 patients (mean age 59 ± 19 years, 52% male), 467 (1.9%) had OMI. QoH achieved higher sensitivity than STEMI criteria (52% [47 to 57] vs 23% [19 to 27]), similar specificity (99% [99 to 99] vs 98% [98 to 98]), higher positive predictive value (51% [47 to 54] vs 17% [15 to 20]), and similar negative predictive value (99% [99 to 99] vs 98 [98 to 99]). The Glasgow algorithm obtained 32% (28 to 37) sensitivity, 98% (98 to 98) specificity, 26% (23 to 30) PPV, and 99% (99 to 99) NPV, and corresponding number for the extended criteria were 41% (36 to 45), 95% (95 to 96), 14% (12 to 15), and 99% (99 to 99). Conclusion In ED patients with chest pain, QoH improved sensitivity in OMI detection compared with currently available ECG criteria, with similar specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindow et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chest pain with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=24,511). Queen of Hearts (QoH) artificial intelligence ECG model vs. Conventional STEMI criteria was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) (29 percentage points increase, 95% CI 22-35). The Queen of Hearts artificial intelligence ECG model improved sensitivity for detecting occlusion myocardial infarction to 52% compared with 23% for standard STEMI criteria, while maintaining 99% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: