Mathematical analysis demonstrates a 39-vertex counterexample to the Albertson-Berman conjecture, indicating planar graphs do not always contain an induced forest of size n/2.
For a graph G, denote by $a(G)$ the number of vertices in the largest induced forest in G. The Albertson-Berman conjecture, which had been open since 1979, states that a(G) ≥ n/2 for every simple planar graph G on n vertices. Although the Albertson-Berman conjecture was recently resolved in the negative by constructing a counterexample with the help of AI, we independently found a counterexample to the Albertson-Berman conjecture without AI and present it in this article. Our counterexample is on $39$ vertices with $a(G)=19$. Finally, we indicate, without a full proof, a variant of this construction with a larger number of vertices, but with a slightly smaller ratio a(G)/n=37/76.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhail Makarov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: