Key result
ISS meal model correlates strongly with standard oral and intravenous tests for metabolic estimates.
Why the study?
Does the ISS model accurately estimate insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function from mixed meal tests compared to OGTT and IVGTT in adult Black and White women?
Observational
Does the ISS model accurately estimate insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function from mixed meal tests compared to OGTT and IVGTT in adult Black and White women?
The ISS model provides a reliable and simpler tool for assessing post-prandial glucose-insulin homeostasis from mixed meal tests.
The ISS (Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity) differential equation model has been previously shown to provide simultaneous estimates of SI and BCF during an oral glucose tolerance test. Using the Federal Women's Study, we adapted the ISS model to fit glucose and insulin dynamics and estimate SI and BCF during mixed meal tests. Our goal was to develop an effective, straightforward, and reliable tool that would be simpler to use than currently available approaches that require technically challenging deconvolution methods to assess BCF. The ISS model for mixed meal tests strongly correlated with oral glucose tolerance tests and gold-standard estimates from intravenous glucose tolerance tests and were reliable when using a shortened 2-hour MMT protocol. The ISS model is versatile, publicly available, and expands the toolbox for assessing post-prandial glucose-insulin homeostasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherman et al. (2026) reported an observational. ISS (Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity) model for mixed meal tests vs. Oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests was evaluated on Correlation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function estimates with oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests. The ISS model for mixed meal tests strongly correlated with oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests for estimating insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: