Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates complete PET conversion into BHET using EPS-derived iron-graphitic catalysts, indicating a circular strategy for dual plastic waste upcycling.
Chemical glycolysis can convert waste poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) into bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET), but recyclable heterogeneous catalysts derived from circular carbon sources and showing low metal release remain limited. Here, post-consumer expanded polystyrene (EPS) was transformed into a hypercrosslinked polymer (HCP) and carbonized with Fe to produce Fe@graphitic-carbon (Fe@C) catalysts for PET glycolysis. The catalysts are denoted mFe@EPS-HCP800, where m represents the nominal Fe loading (wt.%), and 800 is the carbonization temperature (°C). The optimized 5Fe@EPS-HCP800 contained graphitic carbon layers, bamboo-like carbon nanotube (CNT) domains, hierarchical porosity, and Fe-rich domains associated with graphitic carbon coverage. Under atmospheric-pressure conditions (PET, 2.00 g; ethylene glycol, 20.00 g; catalyst, 0.20 g; 200 °C; 2 h), it achieved complete PET conversion and 94.6% BHET yield. The catalyst also maintained BHET yields of ca. 90–94% over ten reuse runs, and post-reaction microscopy confirmed the retention of graphitic carbon layers and Fe-containing domains. Fe was below the detection limit in the product solutions for the 1, 3, and 5 wt.% Fe catalysts, whereas 7Fe@EPS-HCP800 released 9.1 mg kg−1 Fe, consistent with incomplete carbon coverage at excessive Fe loading. Conversion profiles followed an Avrami–Erofeev/Weibull model, giving an apparent activation energy of 205.6 kJ mol−1. The data support a two-stage pathway in which external graphitic carbon/CNT domains promote primary PET chain scission to soluble oligomers, followed by Fe@C interfacial secondary glycolysis to BHET. This work demonstrates dual waste-polymer valorization by using EPS waste as catalytic infrastructure for PET chemical recycling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: