Observational cohort study shows comparable clinical outcomes after anti-CD20 discontinuation in patients over 50 with inactive MS, suggesting cessation may be safe.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether discontinuing anti-CD20 therapy in people with relapsing-onset MS aged over 50 is associated with an increased risk of relapse, inflammatory activity, confirmed disability accrual, and serious infection compared with continuing therapy. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 2283 patients from the French MS registry aged > 50, who had received at least two cycles of anti-CD20 and had experienced no relapses or MRI activity for at least one year prior to inclusion. Patients were classified as discontinuing or continuing therapy and 1:1 matched using a time-dependent propensity score. Outcomes were time to first relapse, inflammatory activity (relapse and/or MRI activity), confirmed disability accrual, and serious infection. RESULTS: Among 1900 patients continuing therapy and 383 discontinuing, 224 in each group were matched (mean age = 57.7 ± 5.9 years; mean EDSS = 5.4 ± 1.7; median follow-up after matching = 34.8 [21.6-50.4] months). There were no significant differences between groups in time to first relapse (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.3, p = 0.2), inflammatory activity (HR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.4, p = 0.6), confirmed disability accrual (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.7, p = 0.2), and serious infections (HR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.8, p = 0.9). INTERPRETATION: This retrospective study found no evidence of differences between stopping and continuing anti-CD20 therapy regarding relapse, inflammatory activity, disability accrual, or serious infections in older patients with long-standing non-active MS over a median 2.9-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moukhine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: