Qualitative study reveals key psychosocial and pragmatic barriers to PrEP access among frontline NGO workers, highlighting the need for simplified care and provider training.
= 13). Thematic analysis was inductive, with barriers classified across four main domains.Participants were mostly cisgender men, median age 48, born in France and abroad, and employed by NGOs in Paris. Thirteen barriers and four major themes emerged: (1) Internal psychosocial barriers: lack of knowledge, negative health-related reactions; HIV stigma; STI risk perception, taboos; (2) Internal pragmatic barriers: perceived limits of protection, usage and follow-up constraints; (3) External psychosocial barriers: limited physician knowledge and reluctance; (4) External pragmatic barriers: communication failures; structural constraints, lack of human and financial resources.Findings call for more targeted messaging, simplified care models and provider training. They highlight the need to address social and symbolic dimensions of PrEP, with insights from those supporting users to ensure more equitable implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roucoux et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: