Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals rescue tube towing optimizes speed and physiological efficiency in lifeguards, indicating equipment-assisted techniques reduce rescuer workload during water rescues.
Direct in-water rescue is a safety-critical task in which towing technique and rescue-support equipment may influence both rescuer workload and task output. This study compared physical workload, towing performance and physiological economy across four mannequin towing techniques: Extended Arm Tow, Double Armpit Tow, “Sailor” Technique Tow and Rescue Tube Tow. Eighteen male water lifeguards (age 18.8 ± 1.3 years; V ˙ O 2 max 56.1 ± 5.0 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ) completed randomized 50-m towing trials after an incremental swimming test to determine maximal oxygen uptake. Towing velocity, gas-exchange variables, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, perceived exertion, oxygen cost per meter and body-mass-normalized oxygen cost per meter were assessed. Rescue Tube Tow produced the highest mean towing velocity and the lowest body-mass-normalized oxygen cost per meter, indicating the most favourable workload–performance profile. Double Armpit Tow elicited the lowest time-based cardiorespiratory strain but did not optimize transport efficiency. Oxygen cost per meter may support ergonomic evaluation of workload–performance efficiency in rescue tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanula et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: