Descriptive analysis uncovers strong capacity alongside lagging innovation in emerging digital markets, highlighting the need for behavioral conversion mechanisms.
Malaysia's 2025 digital competitiveness profile presents an apparent paradox: strong performance in several educational, infrastructure and technology-capacity indicators coexists with weaker downstream performance in scientific employment, knowledge transfer, business agility, adaptive attitudes and digital participation. This exploratory working paper analyses five-year country-ranking trajectories and detailed 2025 indicators from the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking, develops a Capacity-Conversion hypothesis, compares Malaysia with Southeast Asian peers, and introduces a behavioral-adoption lens informed by prior UTAUT research in a Malaysian organizational setting. The paper argues that digital competitiveness should be examined not only through capacity accumulation but through the mechanisms that convert capacity into adoption, innovation, institutional performance and economy-wide value. The analysis is descriptive and hypothesis-generating; it does not establish causation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicco Tan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: