Conceptual framework demonstrates strategic AI engagement protocols for Indigenous communities, highlighting pathways to maintain technological agency and ethical sovereignty.
This is the second foundational paper of the Meta-Relationality and Artificial Intelligence Research Project at the University of Victoria. This article approaches artificial intelligence from the position of an Indigenous person who engages it strategically. I do not understand adoption as endorsement, nor refusal as the only ethical position available to us. The question I take up is not whether Indigenous Peoples should use these systems, but how Indigenous people and communities can retain agency over the terms of engagement: when AI is engaged, by whom, for whose benefit, under what protocols, with what safeguards, and with what forms of refusal still intact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cash Ahenakew (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: