This deposit is the complete, unabridged, single-file master archive of the Myo Min Aung Unified Theory (MUT) research programme, merging all source material from the v7.x source volumes through the v8.42 post-consolidation update volume, in chronological order (Parts I-IX). CONTENTS: - Part I - Preface & Overview (Complete Integrated Edition v8.0-v8.7) - Part II - MUT v7.x Complete Combined Edition (Chapters 1-69) - Part III - MUT Operational & Execution Reports v8.1-v8.7 - Part IV - MUT Complete Integrated Edition v8.13 - Part V - MUT v8.9-v8.13 (standalone editions) - Part VI - MUT v8.15-v8.19 (standalone editions) - Part VII - Companion Technical Notes (CMB consistency; environment-aware acceleration law; SQUID proposals) - Part VIII - MUT v8.20-v8.36 (Complete Version Archive, 17 editions) - Part IX - Continuation v8.37-v8.42 (covariant completion; delta-Phi(z) ODE solver; perturbation-level tension audit; Coleman-Weinberg audit; MGCAMB/CLASS blueprint with corrigendum; post-consolidation update) SUMMARY: MUT is a falsifiable phenomenological scalar-tensor effective framework. Galactic sector: real-data validated (171 SPARC galaxies, chi2 ratio 1.000 vs MOND; environment-dependent UDG reconciliation). Scale hierarchy: retained as an axiom with audited obstructions (RG flow, density running, nuclear EoS, Coleman-Weinberg all audited). CMB: consistent at leading order. GW: inconclusive with delimited reach. Black holes and constants: consistent with explicit no-claims. One predictive success (fast bars, BF = 21.4, SUGGESTIVE). SQUID search pre-registered as the sole decisive test of Axiom 2 (null at < 1e-9 GeV^-1 falsifies Axiom 2 at > 5 sigma). Every claim carries an explicit epistemic status label per the epistemic charter; falsified and retracted claims are documented, not hidden. This is the first public release of the complete archive (version 8.0).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myomin Aung (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: