Theoretical analysis reveals that binary polyhedral groups maximize penalized spectral capacity in finite Cayley graphs, indicating a global geometric selection principle.
The bounded-flux admissibility constraint of the Cosmochrony framework assigns to each spectral sector ρ of a finite Cayley graph a maximal effective amplitude Aᵐᵃˣρ = cBI/√λρ. Aggregated over all irreducible sectors with Peter Weyl multiplicities (ρ)², this local constraint defines a global functional C(G,S) = ∑ρ (ρ)²/√λρ on finite group structures. The central result of this paper is that the admissibility principle is not only a local constraint on individual spectral sectors, but induces a global ordering on admissible group structures: binary polyhedral groups maximise C among all finite groups of comparable order and generating-set size, once interference-inflated sectors are penalised consistently with the axiom of no premature selection (A3). The penalised variant Cα(G,S) is not an ad hoc correction: it is the global form of A3, filtering out sectors whose constructive alignment with the generating set produces an artificially enhanced admissibility window. We compute Cα for representative competitors at valences $d = 6$ and $d = 24$, prove binary-polyhedral maximality for d ∈ \6, 12, 24\ by explicit character-table computation, establish the general conjecture in a precise and testable form, and identify the Ramanujan property as a spectral consistency condition not a direct maximiser of C, but a structural prerequisite ensuring that the spectral hierarchy is not distorted by pathological eigenvalue accumulation. The result completes the chain: local admissibility ⇒ Heisenberg structure; then, for a supplied SU(2) spinor carrier (whose neutral traceless sector is three-dimensional by the conditional adjoint-dimension theorem of O23, the carrier selection and threshold identification remaining open), global spectral dominance of binary polyhedral groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jérôme Beau (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: