Qualitative study demonstrates how the ObCD framework shifts praxis among global therapists, highlighting its role in fostering critical consciousness through a pragmatic approach.
Introduction: Originating in South Africa, the occupation-based community development (ObCD) framework offers a guide for practice that contributes through a critical, justice-oriented occupational therapy practice. Its translation into diverse global settings has been anecdotally noted, but has not been empirically studied. Method: This qualitative descriptive study examined the experiences of practitioners/scholars who utilised the ObCD framework in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, India, and South Africa. In-depth interviews and a focus group were conducted with six occupational therapists and one speech therapist. Inductive thematic analysis was employed. Findings: The theme, “Reasoning through a dialogical process with ObCD,” comprised three categories: (1) Drawing on the critical, occupational and participatory stance of the ObCD to (re)orient practice; (2) Prompting the navigation of a different kind of practice through “seeing more”; and (3) Using ObCD within the contextual limitations of what’s possible. Participants, located mostly in academia, were working out how to use the framework as a way to shift their praxis. Discussion and Conclusion: The translation of the framework therefore occurred through a transpositional, pragmatist approach where the ObCD prompted a critical consciousness that drove a dialogical orientation to working out what needed to occur with students and communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: