Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved AI teaching competency among vocational education teachers, indicating the need for sustained institutional support to prevent skill attenuation.
This paper addresses three typical problems encountered by vocational education teachers in AI-assisted teaching: unclear conceptual understanding, weak practical operation ability, and difficulty in innovative application. A three-in-one improvement system of “competency framework-training content-implementation path” is constructed. First, based on literature analysis and the Delphi method, a four-dimensional competency framework is developed, covering awareness and cognition, tool operation, instructional design, and ethical evaluation. Second, a modular training content system featuring tiered application and integration of theory and practice is designed according to this framework. Third, a cyclical empowerment path of “research-training-application-evaluation” is constructed. The system is validated through quasi-experimental research and longitudinal tracking. Results show that the training system significantly improves teachers’ AI teaching application capability, with the mean scale score increasing from 2.79 to 3.78, representing a relative increase of 35.5% and Cohen’s d of 1.78. The constructed scale shows good reliability and validity, with total α = 0.934. Longitudinal tracking also reveals attenuation in tool-use frequency and innovative applications, indicating the need for sustained institutional support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. D. Zhai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: