Why the study?
Routine discontinuation of aspirin before neurosurgery rests on conventional practice to avoid bleeding, but recent data question this additional risk while prolonged cessation increases myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.
This historical review details the foundational basic science and clinical pharmacology discoveries that established low-dose aspirin as a life-saving antiplatelet drug and the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy.
Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy involves a delicate balancing of the risk of periprocedural blood loss with the cardiovascular and thrombotic risk to the patient. Due to the unique nature of neurosurgery, perioperative bleeding may have devastating consequences and cause major morbidity and mortality. The recommendation to discontinue aspirin prior to major neurosurgical procedures rests upon conventional practice, expert consensus with priority given to avoidance of any major bleed. On the contrary recent prospective data do not support the existence of additional bleeding risk in patients continuing aspirin compared to those who stop aspirin prior to procedure. Patients with cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities are increasingly encountered in the operation theatre these days. In these patients, prevention of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is an important focus for perioperative risk reduction. Prolonged (≥ 7 days) cessation of antiplatelets is one of the most important predictors of MINS. This complicated milieu of risks and benefits highlights the difficulty of practicing evidence-based medicine and minimizing harm in patients on aspirin needing neurosurgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niyogi et al. (2024) conducted a review in Atherothrombosis. Aspirin was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: