Pedestrian crossing safety at non-signalized intersections remains a critical challenge. Proactive pedestrian protection systems, such as pedestrian warning systems, have emerged as reliable alternatives to crash data-dependent analyses. These systems use real-time sensor data to evaluate potential risk and enable timely interventions. Prediction-based Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs), which project current states to estimate future conflicts, are widely adopted for risk evaluation. However, due to the complexity of pedestrian behavior, existing prediction-based SSMs are limited in accurately estimating conflict locations and arrival times, making long-distance risk evaluation particularly challenging. To address these limitations, this study proposes Predicted Lane-based Time to Collision (PLTTC), a novel surrogate safety measure for evaluating pedestrian risks at non-signalized intersections. PLTTC extends Lane-based PET by shifting from precise conflict points to a broader area-based approach and removes rigid kinematic assumptions by employing deep learning for arrival time prediction. Experiments with real-world CCTV data show that: (1) PLTTC outperforms existing SSMs in risk evaluation, particularly in long-distance scenarios, achieving an AUC of 0.92 on the Precision-Recall curve; (2) PLTTC demonstrates superior performance for road users with high variability in velocity, such as kids; and (3) PLTTC shows generalizability through cross-site validation, maintaining consistent performance across different intersection. By addressing long-distance scenarios, capturing high-variability behaviors, and demonstrating generalizability, PLTTC can enhance pedestrian warning systems and improves safety at non-signalized intersections. • Predicted Lane-based Time to Collision (PLTTC) is proposed as a new Surrogate Safety Measure. • PLTTC broadens conflict zones and applies deep learning for arrival time prediction. • Comparative results show improved risk identification in both short- and long-distance scenarios. • It provides higher accuracy for children with complex and variable crossing behaviors. • Validation at two Korean sites, day and night, confirms its robustness and applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: