Key result
Elevated Lp(a) levels (≥215 mg/l) were associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to levels <51 mg/l (OR 1.769; 95% CI 1.305-2.398; P<0.001).
Why the study?
The association between lipoprotein (a) and acute myocardial infarction risk in patients with normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels had not yet been established.
Does elevated Lipoprotein (a) increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with normal LDL-C levels?
Case-Control (n=2,517)
Does elevated Lipoprotein (a) increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with normal LDL-C levels?
Odds Ratio: 1.769 (95% CI 1.305–2.398)
p-value: p=<0.001
Elevated Lp(a) levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction, even in patients with normal LDL-C levels, particularly in males and late-onset subgroups.
Lp(a) elevation may signal higher AMI risk despite normal LDL-C; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk has been renewed interested in recent years. However, the association between Lp(a) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk in patients with normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels has yet to been established. A hospital-based observational study including 558 AMI patients and 1959 controls was conducted. Lp(a) level was significantly higher in AMI patients with normal LDL-C levels than that in non-CAD group (median: 134.5 mg/l vs 108 mg/l, P<0.001). According to Lp(a) quartiles (Q1, <51 mg/l; Q2, 51–108 mg/l; Q3, 108–215 mg/l; Q4, ≥215 mg/l), the incidence of AMI increased with the elevated Lp(a) quartiles (P<0.001 and P for trend<0.001). Logistic regression analysis suggested that patients with Q3 and Q4 of Lp(a) values had 1.666 (95%CI = 1.230–2.257, P<0.001) and 1.769 (95%CI = 1.305–2.398, P< 0.001) folds of AMI risk compared with patients with Q1, after adjusting for traditional confounders. Subgroup analyses stratified by gender and age showed that the association only existed in male and late-onset subgroups. In addition, we analyzed the association of Lp(a) with AMI risk in different cut-off values (cut-off 1 = 170 mg/l, cut-off 2 = 300 mg/l). A total of 873 (34.68%) and 432 (17.16%) participants were measured to have higher Lp(a) levels according to cut-off 1 and cut-off 2, respectively. Participants with high Lp(a) levels had 1.418- (cut-off1, 95%CI = 1.150–1.748, P<0.001) and 1.521- (cut-off 2, 95%CI = 1.179–1.963, P< 0.001) folds of AMI risk compared with patients with low Lp(a) levels. The present large-scale study revealed that elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with increased AMI risk in Chinese population with normal LDL-C levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (n=2,517). Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels vs. Low lipoprotein (a) levels was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.769, 95% CI 1.305-2.398, p=<0.001). Elevated Lp(a) levels (≥215 mg/l) were associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to levels <51 mg/l (OR 1.769; 95% CI 1.305-2.398; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: