This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: This 12-month, prospective, single-arm, postmarketing study assessed efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction for AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 intraocular lens in a Chinese population. Patients and Methods: Adults with bilateral cataracts received TFNT00 (286 eyes); visual acuity (VA) was assessed at 12 months. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), corrected and uncorrected distance VA (CDVA, UDVA), distance-corrected and uncorrected intermediate (DCIVA, UIVA) and near (DCNVA, UNVA) VA, and defocus curve were evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using questionnaires. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Results: 134/144 patients (268/286 eyes) completed the study. At 12 months, MRSE was -0.06±0.36 D. Monocular and binocular CDVA ≤0.3 logMAR was achieved in 99.3% of patients. Mean±SD monocular CDVA, UDVA, DCIVA, UIVA, DCNVA, and UNVA were -0.01±0.13, 0.04±0.13, 0.076±0.14, 0.089±0.14, 0.084±0.13, and 0.096±0.13 logMAR, respectively. Binocular VA was equal to or better than 0.1 logMAR for defocus range +0.5 to -3.0 D. Most patients achieved spectacle independence for distance (94%), intermediate (90%), and near (87%) vision; 88% were "satisfied" or "very satisfied." No device-related AEs were reported. Forty eyes (14%) had posterior capsular opacity (37 were clinically nonsignificant; 1 [0.4%] required posterior capsulotomy). Five cystoid macular edema cases (1.7%) were reported. Severe starbursts, halo, and glare were reported by 15.6%, 4.4%, and 2.3% of patients, respectively, with only 1.5% of patients significantly bothered by each. Conclusion: TFNT00 was safe and effective in a Chinese population, providing good VA at far, intermediate, and near distances, with high rates of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: