A formalism tailored for portal dose image verification is proposed to facilitate the comparison of calculated and measured portal dose distributions. Each portal image is converted into a dose proportional image and normalized to the reference beam calibration dose per monitor unit. The calculated or measured dose to a detector phantom is accordingly normalized so as to enable direct comparison. The collapsed cone kernel superposition method is adapted and evaluated for calculation of portal dose distributions in a water-equivalent detector phantom through comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations and with measurements. The deviation compared with Monte Carlo calculations for 6 and 15 MV was between +0.9% (the 0.9 quantile) and -2.1% (the 0.1 quantile) for a range of investigated geometries. Collapsed cone calculations compared with measurements for clinical fields agreed within [-1.9%, +2.4%] for 15 MV and [-0.9%, +3.2%] for 6 MV for the 0.1 and 0.9 quantiles, respectively. Hence, the absolute portal dose to a detector phantom could be calculated and verified well within the present accuracy requirements for clinical dose calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlgren et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: