Key result
Encoder-decoder based architectures outperformed non-deep learning methods, reproducing expert analysis for left ventricular volumes with a mean correlation of 0.95 and absolute mean error of 9.5 ml.
Why the study?
Automating the delineation of cardiac structures from 2D echocardiographic images remains an active area of research, and the capability of state-of-the-art encoder-decoder deep convolutional neural networks needed evaluation on a dedicated large-scale dataset.
Deep learning encoder-decoder architectures can accurately segment 2D echocardiographic images and estimate left ventricular volumes, outperforming non-deep learning methods and approaching intra-observer variability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports automated LV volume estimation on echocardiography; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Delineation of the cardiac structures from 2D echocardiographic images is a common clinical task to establish a diagnosis. Over the past decades, the automation of this task has been the subject of intense research. In this paper, we evaluate how far the state-of-the-art encoder-decoder deep convolutional neural network methods can go at assessing 2D echocardiographic images, i.e., segmenting cardiac structures and estimating clinical indices, on a dataset, especially, designed to answer this objective. We, therefore, introduce the cardiac acquisitions for multi-structure ultrasound segmentation dataset, the largest publicly-available and fully-annotated dataset for the purpose of echocardiographic assessment. The dataset contains two and four-chamber acquisitions from 500 patients with reference measurements from one cardiologist on the full dataset and from three cardiologists on a fold of 50 patients. Results show that encoder-decoder-based architectures outperform state-of-the-art non-deep learning methods and faithfully reproduce the expert analysis for the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes, with a mean correlation of 0.95 and an absolute mean error of 9.5 ml. Concerning the ejection fraction of the left ventricle, results are more contrasted with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.80 and an absolute mean error of 5.6%. Although these results are below the inter-observer scores, they remain slightly worse than the intra-observer's ones. Based on this observation, areas for improvement are defined, which open the door for accurate and fully-automatic analysis of 2D echocardiographic images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2019 study studied Echocardiographic assessment (n=500). Encoder-decoder deep convolutional neural networks vs. Non-deep learning methods and expert manual annotation was evaluated on End-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes estimation (mean correlation of 0.95). Encoder-decoder based architectures outperformed non-deep learning methods, reproducing expert analysis for left ventricular volumes with a mean correlation of 0.95 and absolute mean error of 9.5 ml.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: