Key result
Femoral vein Doppler showed moderate agreement with the VExUS score (Kappa 0.62, P < 0.001) and good diagnostic accuracy (74.7%) for detecting venous congestion.
Why the study?
Femoral vein Doppler may be useful in assessing venous congestion, but data on its relationship with the multimodal VExUS score are limited.
Does femoral vein Doppler (FVD) accurately assess venous congestion compared to VExUS score and CVP in adult post-cardiac surgery patients?
Observational (n=107)
No
Does femoral vein Doppler (FVD) accurately assess venous congestion compared to VExUS score and CVP in adult post-cardiac surgery patients?
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.62
p-value: p=<0.001
Femoral vein Doppler is a simple and accurate tool for detecting venous congestion that shows moderate agreement with the more complex VExUS score in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Femoral vein Doppler may aid bedside venous congestion assessment post-cardiac surgery; leaves open validation against invasive standards in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Femoral vein Doppler (FVD) is simpler than the VExUS score which is a multimodal scoring system based on combination of IVC diameter, hepatic venous Doppler, portal vein pulsatility and renal vein Doppler, may be useful in assessing right ventricular overload and signs of venous congestion. There is limited data on the relationship between FVD and VExUS score. RESULTS: Adult post-cardiac surgery patients were assessed for venous congestion using the VExUS score and FVD. Agreement between VExUS and FVD was studied using Kappa test, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for VExUS and FVD was calculated keeping CVP as gold standard. In total, 107 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 55.67 ± 12.76. The accuracy of VExUS and FVD for detecting venous congestion was 80.37 (95% CI of 71.5 to 87.4) and 74.7 (95% CI of 65.4 to 82.6), respectively. The level of agreement between FVD and VExUS was moderate (Kappa value of 0.62, P < 0.001) while the agreement between FVD and CVP was weak (Kappa value of 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FVD has good accuracy for detecting venous congestion and shows moderate agreement with VExUS grading. With potentially easier physical accessibility and a shorter learning curve for novices, it may be a simple and valuable tool for assessing venous congestion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhardwaj et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Venous congestion (n=107). Femoral vein Doppler (FVD) vs. VExUS score and Central Venous Pressure (CVP) was evaluated on Agreement between Femoral Vein Doppler (FVD) and VExUS score for detecting venous congestion (Kappa 0.62, p=<0.001). Femoral vein Doppler showed moderate agreement with the VExUS score (Kappa 0.62, P < 0.001) and good diagnostic accuracy (74.7%) for detecting venous congestion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: