Theoretical arguments and indirect observational evidence suggest that the stellar IMF may evolve with time, such that it is more weighted toward high-mass stars at higher redshift. Here we test this idea by comparing the rate of luminosity evolution of massive early-type galaxies in clusters at 0.02 ⩽ z⩽ 0.83 to the rate of their color evolution. A combined fit to the rest-frame U − V color evolution and the previously measured evolution of the M / L B ratio gives x = − 0.3 + 0.4 −0.7 for the logarithmic slope of the IMF in the region around 1 M ☉ , significantly flatter than the present-day value in the Milky Way disk of x = 1.3 ± 0.3. The best-fitting luminosity-weighted formation redshift of the stars in massive cluster galaxies is 3.7 + 2.3 −0.8 , and a possible interpretation is that the characteristic mass m c had a value of ~2 M ☉ at z ∼ 4 (compared to m c ∼ 0.1 M ☉ today), in qualitative agreement with models in which the characteristic mass is a function of the Jeans mass in molecular clouds. Such a "bottom-light" IMF for massive cluster galaxies has significant implications for the interpretation of measurements of galaxy formation and evolution. Applying a simple form of IMF evolution to literature data, we find that the volume-averaged SFR at high redshift may have been overestimated (by a factor of 3-4 at z > 4), and the cosmic star formation history may have a fairly well defined peak at z ∼ 1.5. The M / L V ratios of galaxies are less affected than their SFRs, and future data on the stellar mass density at z > 3 will provide further constraints on IMF evolution. The formal errors likely underestimate the uncertainties, and confirmation of these results requires a larger sample of clusters and the inclusion of redder rest-frame colors in the analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2008 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: