he early motivation for and development of diagonal increments to ease matrix inversion in least squares (LS) problems is discussed. It is noted that this diagonal incrementation evolved from three major directions: modification of existing methodology in nonlinear LS, utilization of additional information in linear regression, and improvement of the numerical condition of a matrix. The interplay among these factors and the advent of ridge regression are considered in a historical and comparative framework
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piegorsch et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: