This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Ship measurements collected over the northeast Pacific along transects between the port of Los Angeles (33.7°N, 118.2°W) and Honolulu (21.3°N, 157.8°W) during May to August 2013 were utilized to investigate the covariability between marine low cloud microphysical and aerosol properties. Ship‐based retrievals of cloud optical depth ( τ ) from a Sun photometer and liquid water path (LWP) from a microwave radiometer were combined to derive cloud droplet number concentration N d and compute a cloud‐aerosol interaction (ACI) metric defined as ACI CCN = ∂ ln( N d )/∂ ln(CCN), with CCN denoting the cloud condensation nuclei concentration measured at 0.4% (CCN 0.4 ) and 0.3% (CCN 0.3 ) supersaturation. Analysis of CCN 0.4 , accumulation mode aerosol concentration ( N a ), and extinction coefficient ( σ ext ) indicates that N a and σ ext can be used as CCN 0.4 proxies for estimating ACI. ACI CCN derived from 10 min averaged N d and CCN 0.4 and CCN 0.3 , and CCN 0.4 regressions using N a and σ ext , produce high ACI CCN : near 1.0, that is, a fractional change in aerosols is associated with an equivalent fractional change in N d . ACI CCN computed in deep boundary layers was small (ACI CCN = 0.60), indicating that surface aerosol measurements inadequately represent the aerosol variability below clouds. Satellite cloud retrievals from MODerate‐resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and GOES‐15 data were compared against ship‐based retrievals and further analyzed to compute a satellite‐based ACI CCN . Satellite data correlated well with their ship‐based counterparts with linear correlation coefficients equal to or greater than 0.78. Combined satellite N d and ship‐based CCN 0.4 and N a yielded a maximum ACI CCN = 0.88–0.92, a value slightly less than the ship‐based ACI CCN , but still consistent with aircraft‐based studies in the eastern Pacific.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Painemal et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: