Key result
Intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score using fluoroscopy showed 100% overall agreement (1.00-κ; p < .001) with postprocedural chest X-ray scores, without increasing procedural time.
Why the study?
The postprocedural timing of the PRAETORIAN score limits its usefulness for guiding S-ICD implantation procedures.
Does intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score assessment using fluoroscopy agree with postprocedural assessment in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation?
Observational (n=40)
Yes
Does intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score assessment using fluoroscopy agree with postprocedural assessment in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation?
Intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score assessment using fluoroscopy is feasible, highly agrees with postprocedural X-ray assessment, and does not significantly increase procedural time, potentially avoiding the need for postprocedural S-ICD repositioning.
May allow intraprocedural S-ICD optimization; confirms agreement but leaves open randomized outcome validation.
INTRODUCTION: The PRAETORIAN score (PS) was developed to assess the implant position and predict defibrillation success of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD). The main critique moved to the routine use of PS has been its postprocedural timing, that limits its usefulness on procedure guidance. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the feasibility of an intraprocedural use of PS. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients undergoing S-ICD implantation were enrolled. Intraprocedural PS (IP-PS) obtained with fluoroscopy before closure of the pocket and postprocedural PS (PP-PS) obtained with two-views chest X-ray were compared. Intraprocedural data and PS were compared with the historic cohorts of the involved institutions. RESULTS: When assessing IP-PS and PP-PS, a complete overall agreement was observed (100%, 1.00-κ; p < .001). When assessing a per-step agreement, a very high-degree of concordance in evaluating Step 1 of the PS was observed (95%, 0.81-κ; p < .001). A complete agreement in Step 2-3 (100%, 1.00-κ; p < .001) of the PS was reported. In comparison with our historical cohort, procedural time in the IP-PS cohort did not increase (45 [41-52] vs. 45 [39-49] min; p = .351) while the expected increase in fluoroscopy time resulted scarce (15 [10-15] s). CONCLUSION: An IP-PS can be reliably obtained using fluoroscopy guidance during S-ICD implantation, without a significant increase in procedural duration and may serve as guidance for implanting physicians, to avoid postprocedural S-ICD repositioning, leading to patient discomfort and significantly enhancing infective risks. IP-PS showed a very high agreement with the PP-PS obtained from two-views chest X-ray.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gasperetti et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation (n=40). Intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score (IP-PS) using fluoroscopy vs. Postprocedural PRAETORIAN score (PP-PS) using chest X-ray and historic cohorts was evaluated on Overall agreement between IP-PS and PP-PS (1.00-κ, p=<.001). Intraprocedural PRAETORIAN score using fluoroscopy showed 100% overall agreement (1.00-κ; p < .001) with postprocedural chest X-ray scores, without increasing procedural time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: