This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this research, we chose six indicators—soil conservation, water conservation, carbon sequestration, windbreak and sand fixation, biodiversity conservation, and forest recreation—to compute the forestland ecosystem service index for forestland within the study region, utilizing time series data. The outcomes reveal that the aggregate index of forestland ecosystem services exhibits a spatial distribution characterized by higher values in the northeastern part and lower values in the southwestern part, with an upward trend over time. Among these functions, windbreak and sand fixation, water conservation, carbon sequestration, and forest recreation all maintained relatively high growth rates. We selected 10 factors that are closely related to the natural environment and human activities and employed spatial principal component analysis to develop a comprehensive resistance surface. Based on the assessment results of forestland ecosystem functions, in conjunction with morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) as well as landscape connectivity analysis, we optimized the method for identifying ecological source sites and extracted 38 ecological source sites. Subsequently, leveraging circuit theory, we extracted 91 ecological corridors and pinpointed 25 ecological nodes, ultimately constructing a forestland ecosystem security pattern (ESP) in the study area and proposing restoration strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: