The hydrolysis of 4- tert -butylcatechol cyclic phosphate and of 4-methylcatechol cyclic phosphate catalyzed by α-cyclodextrin-6A,6B-bisimidazolide, and by the corresponding derivatives of β-cyclodextrin (βCD) and γ-cyclodextrin (γCD), was examined. All three catalysts were able to hydrolyze the substrate derived from 4-methylcatechol, but only the βCD- and γCD-based catalysts could hydrolyze the substrate based on 4- tert -butylcatechol. Saturation kinetics were observed, from which k cat and K m values were derived. The k cat 's showed a bell-shaped dependence on pH, indicating a bifunctional mechanism in which one imidazole acted as a base while the other, protonated, acted as an acid catalyst. The strongest binding was observed between the substrate derived from tert -butylcatechol and the βCD-based catalyst, and this combination also had the highest k cat . An Arrhenius plot showed that the good fit of the tert -butyl group into the βCD cavity leads to an entropy advantage for catalysis within the complex, as well as an advantage in the binding. Furthermore, the combination with the best binding and catalytic constant also exhibited the highest regioselectivity in the substrate hydrolysis, being essentially completely selective for one mode of hydrolysis. All these effects reflect the result of a tight fit of the substrate into the catalyst binding cavity, leading to a well-defined reaction geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breslow et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: