Key result
Antithrombotic treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.21) compared to no treatment in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and a gray-zone risk of stroke.
Why the study?
A treatment gap exists for gray-zone AF patients classified as low or moderate risk by CHADS2 (≤ 1) but not low risk by CHA2DS2-VASc (≥ 2), leaving it unclear whether antithrombotic therapy reduces mortality.
Does antithrombotic treatment reduce all-cause mortality in new-onset atrial fibrillation patients with a gray-zone risk of stroke (CHADS2 ≤ 1 but CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2)?
Cohort (n=1,237)
Does antithrombotic treatment reduce all-cause mortality in new-onset atrial fibrillation patients with a gray-zone risk of stroke (CHADS2 ≤ 1 but CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2)?
In patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and a gray-zone risk of stroke (CHADS2 ≤ 1 but CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2), antithrombotic therapy with warfarin or aspirin is associated with significantly reduced long-term all-cause mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports antithrombotic consideration in gray-zone AF; hypothesis-generating and needs randomized validation.
In clinical practice, some atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were classified as having low and moderate stroke risk by the CHADS2 score (≤ 1) in 2001 but in 2012 they were not truly classified as low risk of stroke according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score (≥ 2) (defined gray zone). Therefore, a treatment gap exists in gray zone AF patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether gray zone AF patients could benefit from reduced all-cause mortality under antithrombotic treatment. This was a longitudinal cohort study performed using data from claim forms submitted to the Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance from January 2000 to December 2011. The new-onset AF patients consisted of a gray zone cohort with a total of 1237 patients being enrolled. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality between 2001 and 2011. Patients in the gray zone receiving antithrombotic treatment had a significant reduction in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.28] compared with the no treatment group [warfarin only: HR, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.15-0.52); warfarin + Aspirin: HR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.15-0.30); and Aspirin only: HR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.16-0.29) ]. All-cause mortality was notably increased when any of the following risk factors were present: age 65-74 years, age ≥ 75 years, chronic kidney disease, and vascular disease. We concluded that AF patients in the gray zone must receive either anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment and there is a lower mortality in these groups during long-term follow-up. Further investigation is needed to observe whether the antithrombotic drugs have benefits for patients with AF with a CHA2DS2-VASc score < 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in New-onset atrial fibrillation with gray-zone risk of stroke (n=1,237). Antithrombotic treatment vs. No treatment was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16-0.28, p=<0.001). Antithrombotic treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.21) compared to no treatment in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and a gray-zone risk of stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: