Key result
The combination of interatrial block and a high CHADS2 score was associated with an approximately 12-fold higher risk of new onset atrial fibrillation (HR 12.18) compared to no IAB and a low score.
Why the study?
Does the combination of interatrial block and a high CHADS2 score predict new onset atrial fibrillation in patients in sinus rhythm?
Cohort (n=1,571)
No
Does the combination of interatrial block and a high CHADS2 score predict new onset atrial fibrillation in patients in sinus rhythm?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The combination of interatrial block and a high CHADS2 score synergistically predicts an approximately 12-fold higher risk of new onset atrial fibrillation in patients in sinus rhythm.
Interatrial block (IAB) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the association of a combination of IAB and the CHADS2 score, an AF-related risk score for ischemic stroke, with new onset AF in patients in sinus rhythm. A total of 1,571 patients (803 males, 768 females; mean age: 58 ± 16 years) were included in this study. IAB was defined as a P-wave duration > 120 ms in the 12-lead electrocardiogram, and a high CHADS2 score as ≥ 2 points. During the mean follow-up period of 4.8 ± 0.7 years, new onset AF occurred in 122 patients (16.1 per 1,000 patient-years). The incidence of new onset AF was 4.0 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with no IAB and a low CHADS2 score, and 44.0 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with IAB and a high CHADS2 score. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for IAB and a high CHADS2 score compared with no IAB and a low CHADS2 score was 12.18 (95% confidence interval: 6.22-23.87, P < 0.001), after adjustment for age, sex, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, smoking, medications, and echocardiographic parameters. In conclusion, IAB and a high CHADS2 score independently and synergistically predict new onset AF in patients in sinus rhythm, indicating an approximately 12-fold higher risk in patients with both IAB and a high CHADS2 score. Patients meeting these criteria should have more aggressive early intervention to prevent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Sinus rhythm (n=1,571). Combination of Interatrial Block (IAB) and high CHADS2 score (≥ 2) vs. No IAB and low CHADS2 score (< 2) was evaluated on New onset atrial fibrillation (HR 12.18, 95% CI 6.22-23.87, p=< 0.001). The combination of interatrial block and a high CHADS2 score was associated with an approximately 12-fold higher risk of new onset atrial fibrillation (HR 12.18) compared to no IAB and a low score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: