Key result
Obesity was associated with significantly increased intrathoracic fat and mediastinal volume, but the major factor restricting total lung capacity in a subset of obese men was reduced thoracic expansion at full inflation.
Why the study?
What is the mechanism of total lung capacity restriction in obese men?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
No
What is the mechanism of total lung capacity restriction in obese men?
In obese men, restriction of total lung capacity is primarily driven by reduced thoracic expansion at full inflation rather than solely by increased intrathoracic fat.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Impaired thoracic expansion may drive TLC restriction in some obese men; leaves open causal mechanisms and intervention targets.
Restriction of total lung capacity (TLC) is found in some obese subjects, but the mechanism is unclear. Two hypotheses are as follows: 1) increased abdominal volume prevents full descent of the diaphragm; and 2) increased intrathoracic fat reduces space for full lung expansion. We have measured total intrathoracic volume at full inflation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 14 asymptomatic obese men [mean age 52 yr, body mass index (BMI) 35-45 kg/m2] and 7 control men (mean age 50 yr, BMI 22-27 kg/m2). MRI volumes were compared with gas volumes at TLC. All measurements were made with subjects supine. Obese men had smaller functional residual capacity (FRC) and FRC-to-TLC ratio than control men. There was a 12% predicted difference in mean TLC between obese (84% predicted) and control men (96% predicted). In contrast, differences in total intrathoracic volume (MRI) at full inflation were only 4% predicted TLC (obese 116% predicted TLC, control 120% predicted TLC), because mediastinal volume was larger in obese than in control [heart and major vessels (obese 1.10 liter, control 0.87 liter, P=0.016) and intrathoracic fat (obese 0.68 liter, control 0.23 liter, P<0.0001)]. As a consequence of increased mediastinal volume, intrathoracic volume at FRC in obese men was considerably larger than indicated by the gas volume at FRC. The difference in gas volume at TLC between the six obese men with restriction, TLC<80% predicted (OR), and the eight obese men with TLC>80% predicted (ON) was 26% predicted TLC. Mediastinal volume was similar in OR (1.84 liter) and ON (1.73 liter), but total intrathoracic volume was 19% predicted TLC smaller in OR than in ON. We conclude that the major factor restricting TLC in some obese men was reduced thoracic expansion at full inflation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=21). Obesity (BMI 35-45 kg/m2) vs. Normal weight (BMI 22-27 kg/m2) was evaluated on Intrathoracic fat volume (liters) (p=<0.0001). Obesity was associated with significantly increased intrathoracic fat and mediastinal volume, but the major factor restricting total lung capacity in a subset of obese men was reduced thoracic expansion at full inflation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: