The objective of the study was the kinetic modelling of the shelf-life of osmotically pre-treated fish during refrigerated and super-chilled storage. Fresh gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata ) fillets were treated for 0–360 min at 15 °C in osmotic solutions 50:5 high dextrose equivalent maltodextrin:NaCl/100 g (HDM), 40:10:5 HDM:trehalose:NaCl/100 g (HDM + treh) and 40:10:5 HDM:glucosamine:NaCl/100 g (HDM + gluc). Water loss, solid gain, salt content and water activity were monitored throughout treatment. Slices untreated and osmotically pre-treated for 45 min were aerobically packed and stored isothermally at 15, 10, 5, 2.5, 0, −1 and −3 °C. Quality assessment was based on microbial growth (total viable count, Pseudomonas spp., Brochothrix thermosphacta , Enterobacteriaceae spp., H 2 S-producing bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, yeasts and moulds), total volatile nitrogen (TVB-N), lipid oxidation (TBARs) and sensory scoring. Quality indices were kinetically modelled and temperature dependence of quality loss rates was modelled by Ratkowsky equation. Osmotic pre-treatment led to significant shelf-life extension of fillets, in terms of microbial growth, chemical changes and organoleptic deterioration. The pre-treatment with the alternative solutes led to depression of the freezing point (−1.8, −2.6, −3.2 and −3.5 °C for the untreated samples and the osmotically pre-treated with HDM, HDM + treh and HDM + gluc, respectively). TVB-N values were higher in untreated samples, followed by osmotically treated fillets, mainly at higher storage temperatures (i.e. 10 and 15 °C). Based on the mathematical models for sensory evaluation scoring, the shelf-life was 12, 19, 22 and 22 days at 0 °C for untreated and osmotically pre-treated with HDM, HDM + treh and HDM + gluc fish slices, respectively, while the respective values at −3 °C were 21, 35, 38 and 38 days. The alternative solutes had no significant effect on the quality and shelf-life of pre-treated fish fillet during storage at refrigerated conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsironi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: