Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on a synthesis of the empirical scholarship on E ngland and G ermany, this paper demonstrates that in both regions, rural socio‐economic developments from c. 1200 to c. 1800 are similar: this period witnesses the rise to numerical predominance and growing economic significance of the ‘sub‐peasant classes’, which had a growing impact on the market as a result of their increasing market dependence, and from which – towards the end of the period – a rural proletariat emerged. Against the influential theory of R obert B renner, it is argued that the period c. 1200– c. 1400 cannot really be categorized as ‘feudal’ according to B renner's definition; and ‘agrarian capitalism’ does not adequately describe the socio‐economic system that obtained by the end of the sixteenth century. A genuine transition to capitalism is only evident from after c.1750, and can be found in G ermany as well as in E ngland; it is predicated both on ideological shifts and on the evolution of the rural proletariat, which is only found in large numbers by or after c. 1800.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shami Ghosh (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: