Key result
Lower educational level was associated with a 6.15% (95% CI 4.35-7.96%) higher estimated cardiovascular disease risk among Dutch-origin men, with weaker associations seen in ethnic minority groups.
Why the study?
Does the socio-economic gradient of estimated cardiovascular disease risk differ between ethnic groups?
Cross-Sectional
Does the socio-economic gradient of estimated cardiovascular disease risk differ between ethnic groups?
The predictive value of socio-economic status for cardiovascular disease risk varies significantly between ethnic groups, being weaker in ethnic minorities compared to the majority population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests education level is a less reliable proxy for cardiovascular risk in ethnic minorities; leaves open how to.
BACKGROUND: European societies are becoming increasingly ethnically diverse. This may have important implications for socio-economic inequalities in health due to the often disadvantaged position of ethnic minority groups in both socio-economic status (SES) and disease, especially cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the socio-economic gradient of estimated CVD risk differs between ethnic groups. METHODS: Using the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study, we obtained data on SES and CVD risk factors among participants from six ethnic backgrounds residing in Amsterdam. SES was measured using educational level and occupational level. CVD risk was estimated based on the occurrence of CVD risk factors using the Dutch version of the systematic coronary risk evaluation algorithm. Ethnic disparities in socio-economic gradients for estimated CVD risk were determined using the relative index of inequality (RII). RESULTS: Among Dutch-origin men, the RII for estimated CVD risk according to educational level was 6.15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.35-7.96%), indicating that those at the bottom of the educational hierarchy had a 6.15% higher estimated CVD risk relative than those at the top. Among Dutch-origin women, the RII was 4.49% (CI 2.45-6.52%). The RII was lower among ethnic minority groups, ranging from 0.83% to 3.13% among men and -0.29% to 5.12% among women, indicating weaker associations among these groups. Results were similar based on occupational level. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic background needs to be considered in associations between SES and disease. The predictive value of SES varies between ethnic groups and may be quite poor for some groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perini et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk. Low socio-economic status (educational and occupational level) vs. High socio-economic status was evaluated on Estimated cardiovascular disease risk based on the systematic coronary risk evaluation algorithm (RII 6.15%, 95% CI 4.35-7.96). Lower educational level was associated with a 6.15% (95% CI 4.35-7.96%) higher estimated cardiovascular disease risk among Dutch-origin men, with weaker associations seen in ethnic minority groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: