Key result
Ivabradine significantly lowered heart rate at 6 months compared to escalated beta-blockers or CCBs (79 vs 94 bpm, p<0.001) in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Ivabradine may play a role in rate control of AF through effects on HCN channels in the AV node, but its role in rheumatic AF required evaluation.
Does ivabradine improve heart rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation inadequately controlled on standard therapy?
RCT (n=80)
Does ivabradine improve heart rate control in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation inadequately controlled on standard therapy?
Ivabradine effectively reduces heart rate and improves symptoms and exercise capacity in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation who are inadequately controlled on standard rate-limiting therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ivabradine for rate control in rheumatic AF; extends RCT evidence to this population.
OBJECTIVES: Ivabradine may have a role in rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to effects on HCN channels in AV node. We studied role of Ivabradine in rate control of rheumatic AF. METHODS: 80 patients, rheumatic AF, HR > 100 bpm (age 47 ± 11 yrs, AF duration 6.8 ± 2.9 years, rate 131 ± 16 bpm) on maximally tolerated ββ or CCB's, randomized to Ivabradine or escalated ββ/CCB. Ivabradine started @ 2.5 mg BD; increased to 5 mg BD if inadequate response at 1 week (failure to decrease HR < 10% vs baseline). After Holter at 1 month, dose escalated to 7.5 mg BD if needed. RESULTS: Ivabradine resulted in significantly lower HR (81 ± 10 vs 99 ± 9) at 3 months and 6 months (79 ± 8 vs 94 ± 8, p < 0.001). Absolute reduction in HR: 56 ± 15 vs 31 ± 14 bpm and % change in HR: 41 ± 7 vs 24 ± 9%, both p < 0.00001). At 6 months, Ivabradine group had. 1Significantly lower NT Pro BNP (1168 vs 1314 pg/ml), higher 6 min walk distance (410 ± 47 vs 349 ± 54 m, all p < 0.001) 2Better symptom class (EHRA score 1: asymptomatic 84% vs 40%), improvement >1 EHRA class; baseline 60% vs 17% 3Better LA Strain (22.8 ± 2.8% vs 20.6 ± 2.5%) Ivabradine was well tolerated and there was no drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Ivabradine can be an option for rate control in rheumatic AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katheria et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Rheumatic atrial fibrillation (n=80). Ivabradine vs. Escalated beta-blockers or CCBs was evaluated on Heart rate at 6 months (p=<0.001). Ivabradine significantly lowered heart rate at 6 months compared to escalated beta-blockers or CCBs (79 vs 94 bpm, p<0.001) in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: