Key result
TCS-based code stroke is linked to ~42-minute faster andexanet administration in factor Xa inhibitor-associated ICH.
Why the study?
The association between Task Calc. Stroke-based code stroke and in-hospital treatment time of andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage was unknown.
Does TCS-based Code Stroke activation reduce door-to-andexanet administration time in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage?
Cohort (n=42)
No
Does TCS-based Code Stroke activation reduce door-to-andexanet administration time in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage?
Implementation of a mobile task-management app for prehospital code stroke activation significantly shortened the door-to-treatment time for andexanet alfa in patients with FXa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage.
May shorten door-to-andexanet time in observational factor Xa inhibitor ICH cohorts; leaves open outcome benefits pending prospective trials.
Background Administration of andexanet alfa has shown to achieve hemostatic efficacy in factor Xa inhibitor (FXai)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH). Code stroke (CS), implemented through the visual task management application Task Calc. Stroke (TCS) facilitates timely reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. However, the association between TCS-based CS and in-hospital treatment time of andexanet for FXai-associated ICrH remains unknown. Methods In this single-center retrospective study, patients with FXai-associated ICrH who received andexanet were enrolled from May 2022 to May 2025. TCS was activated via prehospital notification when patients presented with at least one of the clinical symptoms including face dropping, arm weakness, or speech difficulty with a time from onset or last known well of <24 h. Multivariable linear regression was performed to investigate the association between TCS-based CS and door-to-andexanet administration time. Results Forty-two patients (22 men, median age 80 years) were included. The primary location of hemorrhage was intracerebral ( n = 26), epidural/subdural ( n = 8), or subarachnoid ( n = 8). Among them, 17 (41.5%) were treated with TCS-based CS. The door-to-andexanet administration time was shorter in patients treated with TCS-based CS compared to those without (90 min vs. 132 min, p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that TCS-based CS was associated with door-to-andexanet administration time (Exp [ β ] 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.77) after adjustment with arrival during regular hours and baseline hematoma volume. Conclusion TCS-based CS was associated with a shorter door-to-andexanet administration time for FXai-associated ICrH. The outcome benefit from improved treatment times warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage (n=42). Task Calc. Stroke (TCS)-based Code Stroke vs. Standard care without TCS-based Code Stroke was evaluated on Door-to-andexanet administration time (Exp[β] 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.77, p=<0.01). TCS-based code stroke significantly shortened median door-to-andexanet administration time by 42 minutes (90 vs. 132 minutes, p<0.01) in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: