Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We used Self-Regulation Theory (SRT) to elaborate and describe cognitive and affective representations presumed to underlie CAM decisions in a sample of 55 men who were using CAM after having received conventional treatment for early-stage, localized prostate cancer. Positive representations of CAM were the strongest predictors of beliefs that CAM was necessary for one's health (a 'pulling' effect toward CAM). Nonetheless, negative representations of conventional medicine made an important, though somewhat lesser contribution (a ;pushing' effect away from conventional medicine and towards CAM). Our results also indicate preliminarily that affect may be more important than cognition in shaping CAM decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porter et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: