There is an impressive contrast in well-conducted surveys between the detection of curable tuberculosis and that of curable lung cancer. A significant amount of survey-found tuberculosis is minimal in extent and, therefore, amenable to present-day treatment, whereas, despite immediate emergency referral of persons whose photofluorograms were read suspect neoplasm at two official Philadelphia chest x-ray units, resection could be done in only 30% of a series of 100 consecutive cases. Of 52 persons in this group on whom a three year follow-up period has elapsed, only 5, or 9.6%, survived. Thus, the suitability of single photofluorograms for finding curable lung cancer must be questioned. There are few available data on the prevalence of proved survey-detected lung cancer. Scamman, 1 reporting on 536,012 persons surveyed in Boston in 1949, includes metastatic as well as presumptive carcinoma in a rate of 14.2 per 100,000. Only 43 cases are stated to have been
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katharine R. Boucot (1955) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: