Key result
The mobile integrated health-community paramedicine program was associated with a non-significant trend toward improved 30-day medication adherence in patients with CHF (8% difference) and COPD (14% difference).
Why the study?
Without tracking patients during transition from hospital to home, significant risks of medication-related problems and errors exist, prompting evaluation of the MIH-CP program on medication adherence in patients with CHF and/or COPD.
Does a mobile integrated health-community paramedicine program improve medication adherence in patients with heart failure and/or COPD after hospital discharge?
Observational (n=83)
Does a mobile integrated health-community paramedicine program improve medication adherence in patients with heart failure and/or COPD after hospital discharge?
A mobile integrated healthcare and community paramedicine program showed a non-significant trend toward improved 30-day medication adherence in patients discharged with heart failure or COPD.
Non-significant trends should not change post-discharge care; leaves open MIH-CP adherence effects in prospective trials.
Background: The mobile integrated health-community paramedicine (MIH-CP) program affiliated with the University of Maryland Medical Center focuses on improving patient transitions from hospital to home by addressing both medical and social determinants of health. Until recently, only self-contained health systems could integrate inpatient and outpatient medication data. Without some means to track patients in transition, there is a significant risk of medication-related problems and errors. Objective: To evaluate the impact of the MIH-CP program on medication adherence among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: This is a pilot observational study designed to compare adherence to drug regimens prescribed at hospital discharge (measured by the proportion of days covered [PDC]) between patients enrolled in the MIH-CP program and a propensity-matched control group. Propensity scores were calculated using 11 demographic, diagnostic, third-party payer, and patient care-associated variables. Discharge medication details were obtained from electronic medical records. PDC for each of the medications were calculated from pharmacy claims data. Results: Eighty-three patients were included in the study; forty-three patients were placed in the intervention group and 40 were propensity-matched controls. After adjusting for age, sex, and third-party payer, findings indicated that medication adherence was higher among patients enrolled in the MIH-CP program compared with control during the first 30 days post-discharge, specifically among patients diagnosed with CHF (8% difference in PDC, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.12-0.28%) and COPD (14% difference, 95% CI, -0.15-0.43%), although neither result achieved statistical significance. The differences in medication adherence between patients who were enrolled and those who were not enrolled in the MIH-CP program diminished after 30 days post-discharge. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated a trend toward improved medication adherence among patients enrolled in the MIH-CP program. Future research involving a larger patient cohort will be required to confirm these preliminary findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sokan et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=83). Mobile integrated health-community paramedicine (MIH-CP) program vs. Propensity-matched control group was evaluated on Adherence to drug regimens prescribed at hospital discharge (measured by the proportion of days covered [PDC]) (8% difference (CHF) and 14% difference (COPD), 95% CI -0.12-0.28% (CHF) and -0.15-0.43% (COPD), p=not significant). The mobile integrated health-community paramedicine program was associated with a non-significant trend toward improved 30-day medication adherence in patients with CHF (8% difference) and COPD (14% difference).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: