Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the context of immense control of synthesis methods on the structural and functional characteristics of the materials, nanowire morphologies of Co 3 O 4 are synthesized in conventional reflux and microwave-assisted methods, under homogeneous precipitation conditions. The Co 3 O 4 sample synthesized by the conventional reflux method consists of randomly distributed thin nanowires while the microwave reflux method generates higher-dimensional and arranged Co 3 O 4 nanowires. The surface area and pore structural analysis of the Co 3 O 4 samples show significant difference in their meso- and macroporosity as well as specific surface area, due to differently crystallized products. The UV–Vis-DRS study shows crystallite size dependent optical transitions and band gaps. The magnetic study illustrates finite size effect and low temperature ferromagnetism in both samples; the lower-dimensional nanowires being more ferromagnetic than the higher-dimensional Co 3 O 4 nanowires. Due to smaller crystallite size and more accessible surface sites, the Co 3 O 4 sample synthesized by the conventional reflux method shows better charge storage, high Coulombic efficiency, and enhanced rate response during the pseudocapacitance studies. However the Co 3 O 4 sample synthesized using the microwave-assisted method shows better high rate cyclic stability due to its more rigid orientated nanowire structure. Further, the Ragone plot exhibits considerably higher energy and power densities of lower-dimensional Co 3 O 4 nanowires. Broadly, this study reveals that, under nonhydrothermal homogeneous precipitation conditions, the conventional reflux synthesized lower-dimensional Co 3 O 4 nanowires bear superior surface properties than the microwave synthesized higher-dimensional Co 3 O 4 nanowires, for electrochemical supercapacitor applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumanta Kumar Meher (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: