Why the study?
Does a pretest prognostic score effectively risk stratify ambulatory patients with suspected coronary disease undergoing stress testing for death and myocardial infarction?
Does a pretest prognostic score effectively risk stratify ambulatory patients with suspected coronary disease undergoing stress testing for death and myocardial infarction?
A pretest score previously validated for angiographic outcomes effectively risk stratifies patients undergoing stress testing for long-term risk of death and myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support pretest score for risk stratification in stress testing; extends angiographic validation but leaves open prospective confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: A previously developed pretest score was validated to stratify patients presenting for exercise testing with suspected coronary disease according to the presence of angiographic coronary disease. Our goal was to determine how well this pretest score risk stratified patients undergoing pharmacological and exercise stress tests concerning prognostic endpoints. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: University hospital stress laboratory. PATIENTS: 7452 unselected ambulatory patients with symptoms of suspected coronary disease undergoing stress testing between 1995 and 2004. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: All-cause death, cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The rate of all-cause death was 5.5% (CI 5.0 to 6.1) with 4.3 (SD 2.4) years of follow-up (Exercise 2.8% (CI 2.3 to 3.2) v Pharmacological group 11.9% (CI 10.5 to 13.3); p<0.001). The rate of cardiac death/myocardial infarction was 2.6% (CI 2.2 to 3.0) (Exercise 1.4% (CI 1.1 to 1.8) v Pharmacological group 5.3% (CI 4.3 to 6.2); p<0.001). In both groups, stratification by pretest score was significant for all-cause death and the combined endpoint. However, stratification was more effective in the pharmacological group using the combined endpoint rather than all-cause death. Pharmacological stress patients in intermediate and high risk groups were at higher risk than their respective exercise test cohorts. Referral for pharmacological stress testing was found to be an independent predictor of time to death (2.7 (CI 2.0 to 3.6); p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A pretest score previously validated to stratify according to angiographic outcomes, effectively risk stratified pharmacological and exercise stress patients according to the combined endpoint of cardiac death/myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalisi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: